Write clearer prompts for everyday AI tasks
Describe the task and intended audience and supply the facts the answer must use.
Clear explanations. Practical next steps. 55 ways to get more from your tech.
Describe the task and intended audience and supply the facts the answer must use.
Open the cited primary source and verify that it supports the exact claim.
Work from material you are authorized to share and specify what the summary must preserve.
Remove names and account details that are unnecessary for the task.
Supply the original notes and identify which details must remain unchanged.
Define comparison criteria and give the same evidence for each option.
State your current knowledge and ask for an example grounded in a familiar task.
Separate the fixed instructions from the input fields that change each time.
Confirm names and commitments and remove language that implies a decision you have not made.
Ask for the information needed to answer a clearly bounded question.
Recognize that fluent output is not a guarantee of factual accuracy.
Provide a small anonymized example with the expected result.
Read file and network operations and understand dependencies before execution.
Give the purpose and audience and ask for a structure that supports the intended decision.
Obtain appropriate permission before sharing a recording or transcript.
Compare supported inputs and export formats with the work you need to complete.
Keep essential instructions and relevant source material within the active task.
Provide the original passage and identify terms that must remain precise.
Separate factual claims from suggestions and locate independent primary evidence.
Ask for corrections with short explanations matched to your current level.
Preserve names and measurements and specify the intended audience.
Provide the actual source titles and ask for grouping by topic or difficulty.
State the outcome and available resources and ask for questions that expose missing requirements.
Supply verified specifications and prohibit unsupported performance claims.
Describe the meaningful content and purpose of an image in context.
Treat generated images as illustrations rather than evidence of a real event.
Specify the desired tone and identify facts and quotations that must remain unchanged.
Ask for the exact supporting sentence for each suggested task.
Compare the summary with the source conclusion and any qualifying sections.
Describe the exact symptom and recent changes without sharing secrets.
Save the source inputs and the reasoning you accepted in your normal project records.
Use the same task and evidence and assess results against predefined criteria.
Define the role and the competencies that the interview should assess.
Keep ideas separate from verified facts and give clear constraints.
Describe what you already know and what evidence would answer the question.
Identify which steps follow fixed rules and which require judgment.
Select a format supported by the tools that will receive the document.
Provide the audience and the decision the presentation should support.
Collect representative examples and define what a correct result should contain.
Identify the exact claims in disagreement and locate primary evidence for each.
Provide the documented issue and approved troubleshooting steps.
Supply the domain and source material and request plain language definitions.
Work from an inventory of existing documents and preserve their original links.
Review which files and external services a tool can reach before connecting it.
Check author and title details on the publisher or institution website.
Provide concrete outcomes and observations without private personnel information.
Include the objective and current state and clearly identify unfinished work.
Save meaningful revisions in the same document system used by your team.
Use drafting access before granting any ability to send messages.
Provide the exact message and relevant environment details with secrets removed.
Check factual claims and permissions before using generated material in public.
Provide the specific passage under review and define the question the assistant should answer from that material.
Create a small sample that omits an important fact and check whether the assistant acknowledges the gap.
Identify the step that sends, publishes or changes important information and require an explicit review before that step.